Although most of the literary
analysis is originated from a thorough and profound understanding of the
literature work combined with its author, background era, location, and genre,
it easily turns into a BS. Regulating this short story “The Student” as a
realism work also has a considerable possibility of being a BS. To avoid this
BS, I tried to have a more fundamental understanding of the story’s content and
message itself rather than its tone and literary skills. Therefore I could
finally find out a non-BS reason why this story is realistic: it talks about
BS. To specify, it talks about the BS of human nature.
I found a very interesting
consistency in the beginning and ending parts of the story. Let’s look at the
sentences from both parts.
And
now, shrinking from the cold, he thought that just such a wind had blown in the
days of Rurik and in the time of Ivan the Terrible and Peter, and in their time
there had been just the same desperate poverty and hunger, the same thatched
roofs with holes in them, ignorance, misery, the same desolation around, the
same darkness, the same feeling of oppression -- all these had existed, did
exist, and would exist,……
…… he
thought that truth and beauty
which had guided human life there in the garden and in the yard of the high
priest had continued without interruption to this day, and had evidently always
been the chief thing in human life and in all earthly life, indeed; ……
The first sentence is the student’s
first realization before he arrives at the garden. The next one is his second
realization after he sees the women cry. Two realizations are both about the connection
of past, present, and future. Desolation, darkness, oppression, truth, and
beauty equally exist in all three phases, because they are “linked by an
unbroken chain of events.”
Due to this consistency, the lesson
that past, present, and future are all linked acts as a “topic” of this story.
And the main link is Peter. As we see in the first sentence, the student thinks
that the cold wind may have blown also in the time of Peter, which leads to the
realization. His second perception also comes from Peter. The campfire at the
windows’ garden reminds him of the story of Peter, who denied Jesus thrice,
right in front of a fire in the yard. He told this story to the widows, and
they expressed intense emotions, because they had a connection with the story
about Peter.
As we see, the two realizations are
consistent, even equivalent. Not only the realization itself but the subject
matter is also the same: Peter. Now let’s look at the conclusions, the
aftermaths of each realization that the student has made.
……and the lapse of a thousand years would make life no
better. And he did not want to go home.
……and the feeling of youth, health, vigour -- he was only
twenty-two -- and the inexpressible sweet expectation of happiness, of unknown
mysterious happiness, took possession of him little by little, and life seemed
to him enchanting, marvellous, and full of lofty meaning.
The first one is merely a useless complaint. Without
any will to change and improve the situation, he simply moans that the poverty
and depression has been inherited from the past by inevitable link with the
present. He adds that he doesn’t want to go home (just because he is hungry):
not even a complaint, rather a baby’s whining. Well, “he was only twenty –two”.
Then, after the pointy-headed talk with the widows,
the conclusion suddenly turns into a grandiose one that might suggest eternal delight
to the whole world. He feels an ineffable enchantment, as though he reached
nirvana and discovered a permanent truth. However, in reality, he doesn’t even
know that his perception is exactly same as that before the talk.
Now we see an inconsistency, a BS. Although they
originate from the same realization and subject matter, the student’s
conclusion and feeling before and after the talk are totally the opposite. Even
the age of twenty-two makes him a hungry, whining baby before and a healthy and
vigorous youth after. Why does this happen? Simply because he was cold and
hungry at the beginning and was very glad at the ending. He might have been
proud of himself that he told such a touching story to his audience and finally
made them cry. This mere change of emotion turned him from a baby to a Saint.
However, as we now all know, the Saint’s realization, although decorated with fancy
words and phrases, was only a depressing, hungry knowledge that the baby had
already well known. Silly, isn’t he?
No, he is not silly at all. He is only an ordinary
man that sometimes deludes himself in favorable circumstances. We all fall into
such delusions. It’s the BS of human nature. People are essentially ironic, so
their thoughts and philosophies greatly depend on the immediate circumstances
and emotions, not the essence. For example, if there is no meat in the menu on
Monday, we blame the school meal for not deserving the expensive price.
However, if the Tuesday menu is fried chicken and steak, we exclaim, and thank
the school meal system for the cheap but wonderful meal. The reality is that
the essence has never changed: price, chefs, and the school meal system were exactly
the same on Monday and Tuesday, so it is a BS to make opposite evaluations on
the school meal. But this is exactly how we all behave!
Moreover, in our youth, we easily delude
ourselves that we are awesome and our philosophies are grandeur. At the
transition period from a child to an adult, and at the period of learning and
training, we often experience some kind of realizations, as the student did.
Not all of them are noteworthy in our lives, but they all seem to be brilliant
at that very moment. In the case of this story the perception is insignificant.
The story thoroughly portrays the process of a young man coming up with a
trivial realization but admiring himself, a common and realistic BS of a youth.
Perhaps this is why the title of the story is “The Student”.
Now we can finally answer to the question that in
what way this story is a realism work. This work portrays the intrinsic BS of
human thought process extremely realistically. A student realizes that the past
and the present are connected, makes two opposite conclusions, and quivers in
joy that he had discovered the truth. Through this student, the author shows
how ironically humans, particularly youths, behave. He reveals how dependent
humans are on the instantaneous emotions and circumstances. He discloses how exaggeratedly
people think of themselves. He demonstrates who we truly are, and what we are
really filled of: BS. How could a story be more realistic?
To start with - the "BS" factor indeed applies, and I don't mind you mentioning it. However, don't get in the habit of using it within your written work. For the most part, I'd like to restrict it to class discussion. Ironically, the "BS" has yet to truly begin. Just wait until "post-modernism." Chekhov is actually the opposite of BS in most cases (as you eventually, though meanderingly, point out).
답글삭제As for a link formed with "Peter." Keep in mind we are dealing with two different Peters - Peter the Great of Russia's treacherous history, and Peter the apostle from the bible. The link Ivan reflects on has more to do with standing at a fire among those who have to deal with emotional burden (guilt etc.).
As for Ivan being a "cry baby," I think we'd all have something to cry about if we were a random peasant stuck just about anywhere in Russian history at any time and any place. His negative thoughts about Russian history are fairly "realistic." All in all, he is starting the story as a "pessimist" and then we quickly witness how his mood becomes optimistic. Indeed, human nature is flighty, especially at the age of 22. You are very right about Chekhov's depiction.
The wonderful thing about this story is that it is a bit of a riddle. We aren't entirely sure what we are "supposed" to think, if anything. It is a true work of art that requires different points of view. How harsh we are towards Ivan is different for everyone, and the state of mind he left the widows in is another thing to argue about.
Good journal, and I don't mind a bit of risk-taking in terms of tone and conclusion. But, in university, this approach will not work. You probably know that, but if you don't you may suffer the winds of Ruric.
yup it wouldn't work in university T.T I just wanted to directly write about what I felt about this story, based on my own impression, not on genres and literary analysis tools. Something like 'Ah, this guy is acting as if he has realized something grandiose, although that was something he had been complaining about at the beginning. Wait, isn't this similar to me praising the school meal one day and complaining the other day?' And I thought perhaps Checkov wanted to tell us the reality of how flighty humans are...... Well maybe I just didn't like the guy in this story lol
삭제I didn't know that they were different 'Peter's, and maybe that requires some change for the direction of this essay.
I admit that I did not think about why widows cried, although that would change the thesis of the story.
Thank you! Maybe next time I would be loyal to the traditional analysis of this story.